Lil Peep’s Mom Sues Late Rapper’s Managers Over Death – Rolling Stone

Lil Peep’s mother, Liza Womack, has filed a lawsuit against the late rapper’s managers for negligence, breach of contract and wrongful death, among other charges, according to a complaint obtained by Rolling Stone. The news was first reported by The New York Times.

The suit alleges that Peep’s handlers ignored his physical and mental health and instead pushed the rapper, whose real name was Gustav Ahr, “onto stage after stage in city after city, plying and propping him up” with illegal drugs and unprescribed medication. The suit was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court and is seeking unspecified damages.

“This is something that I must do as a mother,” Womack told the Times. “I feel very concerned that they not be exploited. What Gus had to live through is actually horrifying to me, and I’m sure he’s not the only person his age in this situation.”

The suit specifically names Peep’s former label/management company, First Access Entertainment, and its chief executive Sarah Stennett. It also includes Bryant Ortega (also known as Chase), a member of Peep’s management team, and Belinda Mercer, who worked as Lil Peep’s tour manager during his final run in fall 2017. (Stennett, Ortega and Mercer did not immediately reply to Rolling Stone’s requests for comment.)

Ahr died from an overdose of fentanyl and Xanax in November 2017 while he was on tour at the age of 21. Womack’s suit alleges that throughout 2017, Peep was “stressed, overwhelmed, burnt out, exhausted and physically unwell,” but that Stennett and First Access “fostered, promoted and encouraged” drug use in order to maintain control over the rapper.

The suit alleges that Stennett gave Ahr a bottle of unspecified pills as a gift during a 2017 dinner, while it also cites text messages from her, in which she tells him she has two different doses of Xanax pills for him. It also claims that Ahr was in a sexual relationship with Mercer while she was his tour manager, and that Mercer allegedly provided the rapper with drugs, including ketamine.

The suit further alleges that “some of these drug runs and illegal transactions were captured in the form of payments to Riley Fatch by Mercer, described as ‘bus maintenance’ and ‘bus restock,’ on the Venmo mobile payment platform, paid directly or reimbursed by FAE.” Rolling Stone has learned that Fatch was indicted for possession with intent to sell methamphetamine in 2018. The case was dismissed upon Fatch’s death in May 2019.

The day before Ahr’s death, during a tour stop in El Paso, Texas, the suit claims that Ahr told his handlers he didn’t want to perform. In response, the suit claims that Ahr was told to “take an excessive amount of Xanax so as to make himself sick, which would in turn trigger insurance coverage of the cancellation.” The suit alleges that the following night, when Ahr died, Mercer and others saw that he looked “alarmingly unwell,” but ultimately declined to seek help.

According to the suit, shortly after Ahr’s death, Ortega tweeted: “I’ve been expecting this call for a year. Mother fuck.”

Much of the lawsuit pulls from David Peisner’s Rolling Stone feature on Lil Peep’s final days. In that story, Stennett denied that she gave Ahr pills. She also claimed she didn’t know what kind of drugs people were using on the bus, and that she and Ortega repeatedly encouraged Peep to seek counseling.

Much of the case will hinge on whether or not Womack can prove that First Access Entertainment purposefully facilitated Peep’s drug use, or that they had an obligation to look out for him and did not adequately do so. While Womack’s lawyer Paul A. Matiasic acknowledged that Lil Peep “had a role” in his own death, he said that “evaluating the legal responsibility for someone’s untimely death … is not a binary decision.” He argued that First Access had the power, influence and control over Lil Peep’s career and that, “There are duties associated with having that type of control.”

In This Article:
Lil Peep

Want more Rolling Stone? Sign up for our newsletter.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)